Peter Mandelson: From Korea to India, trade is the way out of poverty
From a lecture at the London School of Economics, by the European Commissioner for Trade
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Trade can make a huge contribution to development, once the capacity to participate in the global trading system is established. A long intellectual debate has raged about whether countries that have pursued a "strategic" approach to trade - the Korean model - have been more successful in promoting economic development than those who have let market forces prevail - the Singapore model.
Trade can make a huge contribution to development, once the capacity to participate in the global trading system is established. A long intellectual debate has raged about whether countries that have pursued a "strategic" approach to trade - the Korean model - have been more successful in promoting economic development than those who have let market forces prevail - the Singapore model.
I am not a neo-liberal dogmatist about this. Infant industry protection may be necessary for a time. The risk is that the protectionism it offers becomes entrenched; vested interests defend it; and as the newly nurtured industries mature into adolescence, they cannot withstand fair global competition.
I am, however, certain of this truth. Countries that have adopted a closed approach to the world economy have not been successful. As a young man, I was optimistic about the prospects of Ujamaa socialism in Tanzania, but harsh experience taught me otherwise.
Similarly, India's attempt at state industrial planning under Nehru, and since, simply did not work. What has been a success in India is the gradual opening of their economy to the outside world in the last 15 years.
This has raised India's growth rate with the consequence that 300 million people have been lifted out of extreme poverty in a generation. Of course, there are still a further 300 million people who are forced to live on less than a dollar a day. But domestic liberalisation, reinforced by greater openness to the outside world, has put India on a sustainable growth path that offers India's poor a realistic hope for the future.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments