Paul Krugman: Bush's economic policies are Robin Hood in reverse
From a speech by the professor of economics at Princeton University to the Institute for Public Policy Research
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We have a very radical government in the United States right now and it's primarily about domestic policy. Ronald Reagan had tax cuts that weren't funded, but there is a theory - supply-side economics - under which they made sense. You could say that's a silly theory, but there was at least a theory. George Bush is simply saying that two minus one equals four.
We have a very radical government in the United States right now and it's primarily about domestic policy. Ronald Reagan had tax cuts that weren't funded, but there is a theory - supply-side economics - under which they made sense. You could say that's a silly theory, but there was at least a theory. George Bush is simply saying that two minus one equals four.
A combination of dishonesty and irresponsibility runs through all his economic proposals. The level of cooking the books that goes on in each of the major policy proposals, I think, has got no precedent in US history.
These economic policies are Robin Hood in reverse. You have a set of tax cuts which are completely unfunded - there's no explanation of how we can afford these tax cuts. Of course we all believe in cyclical policy, so a temporary set of tax cuts and spending increases in the face of a depressed economy makes sense. But these are all intended to be permanent tax cuts, and yet we have a large structural deficit in the United States, so these are tax cuts that enlarge a structural deficit.
Something has to give eventually. There is no explanation of where that is going to come from, but on any plausible model of how the budget is eventually brought under control - whether it is through increases in other taxes or cuts in social security programmes which is where the money is - the tax cut plus spending cut package ends up leaving a large majority of the population worse off and a small minority of the population a lot better off.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments