Paul Judge: Good technological design can make us all happier
From a speech by the chairman of the Royal Society of Arts at its 250th anniversary conference
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Human history is shaped by ideas. Seventy years ago at Cambridge, Professor Ernest Rutherford first split the atom, clearly one of the most fundamental experiments of the 20th century. He was visited by some American scientists who were amazed at the cramped facilities in which he worked, and the poor quality of the equipment. Rutherford explained that good science did not need plush laboratories. He said, "It is true we don't have much money, so we have to think."
Human history is shaped by ideas. Seventy years ago at Cambridge, Professor Ernest Rutherford first split the atom, clearly one of the most fundamental experiments of the 20th century. He was visited by some American scientists who were amazed at the cramped facilities in which he worked, and the poor quality of the equipment. Rutherford explained that good science did not need plush laboratories. He said, "It is true we don't have much money, so we have to think."
We should therefore consider today's challenges. We are facing a future of unprecedented competition in business and intense pressure to deliver quality public services that meet people's needs. Imagine a world where elderly people are cared for by robots. Replacing human contact with a machine would seem to be an awful idea. But some people have no contact with caregivers at all. If the choice is going to a nursing home or staying at home with a robot, maybe people will choose the robot.
Automation is almost the defining word of the industrial revolution and a dominant theme of IT application. Yet we are still only at the early stages of giving machines the variety of flexibility of action we see in the natural world, such as balancing on two legs or climbing a tree.
New technologies are creating a world where, in developed nations, anything is possible. We have more choice about where we work, where we live and how we live. Design and technology go hand in hand. Design must play a central role in ensuring that people will not be isolated or reduced by the technology revolution. We are moving so fast with technology, but we do not always appreciate or understand the issues it raises.
A famous seminar about design was held at No 10 Downing Street in 1984 and called "design for profit". Now we might talk about "design for people".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments