Paul Cann: A disgrace still beyond government's wit

Thursday 23 November 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As leader of the Opposition in 1996, Tony Blair said of mixed-sex wards: "Is it beyond the wit of the Government and the health administrators to deal with that problem?" After nine years, sadly, it still seems that the answer is yes.

The Government has made promise after broken promise about the phasing out of mixed-sex wards. Yet, nine years on, the Patients Association is reporting an increase in calls from older people and worried relatives with tales of outrage and confusion about being placed on a mixed-sex ward. They are angry, and rightly so.

My own mother was faced with the indignity of a bed on a mixed-sex ward in 1990. Suffering heart failure, she was placed in a bed opposite a man with dementia and uncontrollable behaviour. Help the Aged launched "Dignity on the Ward" to stop this kind of thing. Sadly, it still seems a common occurrence on NHS hospital wards.

Older people shouldn't be burdened with the worry and humiliation of undressing or bathing on a mixed-sex ward.

The Government's definition of "single" sex wards is incredibly narrow. A single sex ward is not achieved simply by using a curtain as a partition.

Last week, the Government proudly launched its own "Dignity in Care" campaign. Help the Aged has shown great support for the Department for Health's new initiative to promote dignity. It is an important campaign, which has long been called for. But it will be empty if it doesn't stop the nightmare experience of sick people being made to feel even worse, like parcels being passed around.

Dignity must not be a rhetorical slogan. It's about how you are spoken to, about having the window open to hear the birds in your last hours, about what you eat and how you get help to eat. It's about being treated as a whole human being, not a set of clinical challenges. It's about your humanity.

For those at the end of their lives, the need for that extra dignity and respect has never been greater.

How we help people to die, in comfort, companionship and serenity, is the ultimate test of our decency. Not shunting people on to a ward, where their most private functions are the least private they've ever been.

The writer is director of policy and research at Help the Aged

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in