Patrick Cockburn: There is still no government and violence is increasing

Tuesday 31 August 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Iraq the US is leaving behind is a country in which violence is increasing and political parties have failed to produce a government six months after parliamentary elections. The Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki proclaimed Iraq's "independence" in a television address yesterday. "Our security forces will take the lead in ensuring security and safeguarding the country and removing all threats that the country has to weather, internally or externally," Mr Maliki said. But such threats have increased with insurgents launching 13 bomb attacks in all parts of Iraq on one day last week. Some 500 people are estimated to have been killed over the last month.

The withdrawal of the last US combat brigades does not directly affect security because American soldiers pulled out of cities and towns in June 2009. And stopping the local branch of al-Qa'ida, which has little connection with Osama bin Laden's organisation, is more a matter of improved intelligence than greater troop numbers. The failure to form a new Iraqi government half a year after the poll on 7 March reflects the deep divisions between the three main communities – Sunni, Shia and Kurd – and a split between the two Shia groupings: the State of Law and the Iraqi National Alliance (INA). Mr Maliki insists on holding on to his job while the Islamic parties of the INA have insisted he must go before they join a coalition.

"Maybe Iraq is finished," said Ghassan Attiyah, a commentator and political scientist. The US has been encouraging the formation of a power-sharing government in which Iyad Allawi, the leader of al-Iraqiya party, most of whose supporters are Sunni, would have an important post.

One solution to the current political stalemate is the formation of a National Security Council with real authority, headed by Mr Allawi. Even if this happened, it is unclear how far Mr Maliki would be willing to cede more than token power. Another scenario would be for the present Shia-Kurdish coalition to continue with the Sunnis only obtaining a minimal share of power.

But the inability of Iraqi parties to reach an agreement is increasing the influence of Iraq's neighbours who give support to different parties and groups. US authority is waning as it pulls out its troops and shows its waning interest in what happens in Iraq. Meanwhile, the importance of Turkey, Iran and other neighbours is growing because Iraqi communities are more frightened of each other than they are of foreign powers. The Iraqi Kurds increasingly look to Ankara as an ally against the Iraqi Arabs and the Sunni, once enemies of the US, came to see American troops as defenders against the Shia.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in