Nigel Hawkes: Why delaying death has created a statistical nightmare

Behind The Numbers

Friday 06 August 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The relatives of Terry Jupp, a Ministry of Defence scientist who died testing explosives in 2002, have had to wait eight years for an inquest.

Although this is exceptional, the average wait for an inquest is six months, and a year or more is not uncommon.

While you wait, the dead person is not, officially, dead. In England and Wales (but not Scotland) a death cannot be registered without a cause of death. The delays created by the ancient system of coroners' inquests are a serious problem for statisticians.

For instance, when a new recreational drug such as mephedrone appears, trends in drug-related deaths are impossible to follow because most are referred to coroners whose verdicts appear at unpredictable times in the future. This makes it impossible to compare drug-related deaths with changes in drug-taking behaviour until years later.

Or suppose you wanted to run a trial of different ways of preventing prisoners with a history of drug-taking from dying of an overdose soon after release, as many do. You could allocate half the prisoners at random to a particular intervention after release, do nothing for the other half, and compare outcomes. But only if deaths were recorded promptly. As it is, such a trial would fail the normal ethical tests as it would provide no way of letting participants know quickly if a given intervention worked, or made things worse – and trial volunteers are entitled to this information.

Delays in recording deaths bedevil mortality statistics. The proportion of deaths referred to coroners has risen since the Shipman murders, and with the increasing use of deputising services for out-of-hours care. Last year, 229,000 referrals were made (46 per cent of all deaths) and 31,000 inquests were deemed necessary.

So although a death must normally be registered in England and Wales within five days, many aren't until much later. It's fine to wait a while to establish the cause of a death, but nonsense to wait so long to record the fact of a death. In Scotland, where deaths must be registered in eight days, death certificates can be issued without a known cause of death.

Coroners in England and Wales can issue "an interim certificate as to fact of death" before a cause is determined. This helps the bereaved access bank accounts and administer the estate. It seems only tradition is stopping this provision being applied to all deaths reported to coroners.

Nigel Hawkes is Director of Straight Statistics ( straightstatistics.org)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in