Michael Glover: The gutless, tepid daubs of a slave to tradition

Critic's view

Friday 21 August 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hitler's watercolours – the inert works of a relatively talentless painter who was expelled from art school and later wreaked his vengeance upon the world – have been on view more than once in the past year or so.

In the summer of 2008, in a rather sadly predictable and entirely shameless gesture of self-publicity, the Chapman brothers bought a batch, over-painted them with silly rainbows and witches on broomsticks and put them on display at the White Cube alongside their giant tableau of Hell.

And it is the same with this rather tepid handful of works in watercolour which will shortly go on auction in Nuremberg.

They are so tame, these works – almost gutlessly under-energised. And that itself is interesting, of course. The works themselves give us no inkling that a madman would emerge in the end. There are no fuming Aryan gods here, no sense that there are pent forces in the wings waiting to explode. They don't have that kind of energy.

They are poor daubs of the kind that any adolescent painter of limited technical means, and even more limited artistic vision, might have done – enslaved to tradition, wooden, rule-bound, from first to last.

They show us bland rural scenes that any Sunday painter from Bavaria might have been drawn to at any moment over a period of several hundred years: a schloss in the sunlight, a country church, a farm building beside a river.

There is no sense that they were made at a particular historical moment, that revolutions and wars were engulfing the world.

They seem to have been painted by a man with tunnel vision, and without any sense that he was living in a world whose art, too, was in a state of revolutionary ferment.

It is Kandinsky who looks like the madman, not sad, artistically craven, toe-sucking Adolf.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in