Mark Hughes: This time the victims are being put first
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yesterday's statement by Scotland Yard will be seen as an admission that their first investigation was a failure. The force accepts that it wrongly told a number of individuals that their details did not appear on material seized from Glenn Mulcaire when in fact they did. Yesterday they informed them that their phones may have been hacked.
It adds weight to the suggestion that detectives were keen to quickly close down the original operation, either through fear that they would upset Rupert Murdoch's powerful News International, or because they simply did not treat the investigation seriously enough.
Sources at the Met insist that yesterday's statement is no such admission. They say detectives only identified individuals who had been wrongly told they were not Mulcaire's targets after reviewing old evidence alongside new evidence that the News of the World handed the force last month. By "putting two and two together" detectives realised they had wrongly given a "small number" of people erroneous information.
This new investigation is being treated seriously by Sue Akers and her team. She has pledged to contact all of the 4,332 people whose names or details were found in Mulcaire's documents – something the Met has been criticised for not doing earlier. Such an undertaking shows that perhaps unlike the previous investigation the potential victims are at the heart of this inquiry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments