Letter from Simon Kelner: Friendships that you can count on

 

Simon Kelner
Wednesday 28 September 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I was intrigued by the results of a survey published yesterday, which claimed that, on average, adults have 26 close friends.

This figure is surely reflective of the Facebook age, when "friends" are often little more than contacts, or maybe people who once heard your name mentioned, or those who succumb to the personal equivalent of Amazon recommendations: "If you like the look of him, you might also like him." Because it seems to me – and I admit this may be an admission of my own unpopularity – that 26 is a very high number of people to count as close friends. I would go as far as to suggest that, for most adults, anything in double figures is pretty unusual.

It all depends, of course, on the definition of a close friend, and we would all have different interpretations of such. For instance, do you have to have regular contact with someone to maintain closeness? Most people would say that you do, but I have one or two friends to whom I rarely speak, but when we do – sometimes with more than a year's gap – it's as if we are still in the middle of a conversation, or one of us has just returned after visiting the loo.

This may be a blokey thing – the willingness not to chastise, or even notice, lack of contact – but I don't think I'm unusual in feeling that closeness in friendship indicates emotion rather than proximity. And the older one gets, the more people one meets, and the harder it is to devote time to each one individually.

A friend of mine told me about someone she met every morning while they were exercising their dogs. They would exchange pleasantries, and then one day she asked him whether he'd like to have coffee one morning. "I'm terribly sorry," he said, "but I'm afraid I have enough friends in my life. But give me your number and, if I find have a vacancy, I'll give you a call."

This is a true story and one you may find a little shocking – he did call some months later when one of his friends emigrated – but I think it's true that, at a certain age, we find the management of all our friendships increasingly difficult. I don't quite subscribe to John Cooper Clarke's adage – "A friend in need is a friend in debt" – but the idea of 26 close friends? It sounds too much like hard work. In any case, how could I possibly devote myself to meaningful human contact when I've got my 111 "friends" on Facebook and my 5,060 followers on Twitter to consider?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in