Kim Sengupta: Democracy will be casualty in the race to cut deal

Analysis

Sunday 18 October 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The elections held in Afghanistan in August were meant to show how democracy has taken root in the country since the overthrow of the Taliban. Instead the polls became mired in massive fraud, reopened historic, ethnic and political divisions, and led to questions about why Western troops are being sent to fight and die for a seemingly corrupt and cynical government.

There was widespread criticism by the US, Britain and their allies about the ballot-stuffing carried out on behalf of incumbent President, Hamid Karzai. But the investigation into malpractice, and the steps being put forward to rectify what took place, now present major problems for the international community.

The Election Complaints Commission (ECC), the watchdog on malpractice, is expected to strip down Mr Karzai's majority from the 54 per cent declared before the investigation to below 50 per cent, forcing a second round run-off with his nearest rival, the former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah.

However, a run-off is also dependant on Mr Karzai and his supporters accepting the decision of the ECC, a body where non-Afghans have a majority. The Independent Election Commission (IEC), which is dominated by Afghans – and by Karzai placemen – are threatening to ignore the ECC's demands for reballoting amid claims by the President of a foreign conspiracy to prevent him resuming power.

Under the constitution the ECC is supposed to supersede the IEC. But there is little appetite for a second round among either the international community or the Afghans, except among the most diehard supporters of Dr Abdullah. It would be a logistical and security nightmare to organise fresh polls before the bitter Afghan winter closes in.

The alternative would be to wait until next spring, But this would leave the state in limbo while accusations and recriminations continue to fly. A delayed run-off would also create difficulties for Barrack Obama as he decides whether to send tens of thousands of extra troops, as requested by his ground commander, General Stanley McChrystal.

Thus the stream of calls to Mr Karzai and Dr Abdullah from Hillary Clinton, Gordon Brown, Bernard Kouchner, and others urging them to arrive at some form of a deal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in