Kate Allen: Britain must act to stop this outrage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Why has the Government abandoned them? The Government's answer: they're not British - we don't feel any obligation toward them. Let other countries speak up for them.
No matter, apparently, that they have British wives or children. That they are in some cases officially recognised refugees from countries such as Libya, Iraq or Jordan, where no help is likely. And no matter that the US apparently wishes to send them back to Britain.
UK government criticism of the regime at Guantanamo has been patchy at best. Last year Tony Blair called the camp "an anomaly". Peter Hain, pinned down on a television programme, agreed that it was wrong and that, yes, he did oppose Guantanamo's existence. Charles Falconer went a step further. The camp was an "affront to democracy", he said.
Now that we are, incredibly, marking the moment that some prisoners have spent five years of their lives at Guantanamo, it's easy to forget that the UK Government defended the camp for much of this time. On the relatively rare occasions that senior politicians spoke about it, they often referred to the supposed dangerousness of the detainees. They typically downplayed or ignored the fact that the White House had barred human rights groups from this prison, suspending even minimal legal protections, pressing on regardless of the damage to international human rights agreements.
Supposing, then, that the UK Government now wishes to make up for lost time over Guantanamo, what should it do? First, it should immediately negotiate the return of Jamil el-Banna and the seven other UK residents. In the relatively unlikely event that there are criminal charges facing any of these men, they should of course be prosecuted in proper courts in the UK.
Second, the Government should stop pussyfooting around Guantanamo detentions and make it abundantly clear - in public and in private - that it strongly opposes this wholesale affront to democracy and will do everything in its power to bring about Guantanamo's closure.
Third, the Government should also unambiguously condemn all other secret "war on terror" detentions (the so-called "black site" prisoners) as well as the "rendition" flights that underpin them.
Kate Allen is the director of Amnesty International UK
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments