Julius Cavendish: 'Taliban' killings may not be all they seem

Wednesday 27 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

They killed Ahmed Wali Karzai by somehow turning one of his most trusted lieutenants, who then gunned down the Kandahari strongman in a move he must have known would end in certain death. Then Taliban gunmen raided the villa in Kabul where another southern strongman, Jan Mohammad Khan, lived, shooting him dead as he supped with an Afghan MP. Now the Taliban has taken out another Karzai ally, using a suicide bomber who smuggled his explosives past security in his turban.

The three different approaches are symptomatic of the way the Taliban has stepped up its campaign of targeted attacks, matching Nato's own escalation of the Afghanistan war with a troop surge and an unprecedented number of Special Forces raids on Taliban commanders.

According to the UN, the Taliban is relying on suicide bombers more than ever and child soldiers are also taking part in its campaign in greater numbers. Earlier this year, Newsweek reported that the Taliban's head of military operations, Mullah Abdul Qayum Zakir, had ordered Taliban field commanders out of their safe havens in Pakistan and across the border into Afghanistan.

Analysts say there are a variety of reasons for the spike in Taliban attacks. "What we've seen over the past few months is an increasing tactic on both sides, [Nato] and the Taliban, to try to wage the war through targeted killings," Martine van Bijlert, of the Afghanistan Analysts Network, said. "Partially that has an impact in the battlefield and partly on morale and partly it is also to project a certain position of strength. I would think the Taliban is trying to project presence and infiltration and penetration and staying power."

But the truth is murkier than that. It's long been recognised – especially in Kandahar – that the Taliban provide convenient cover for any powerbroker or criminal syndicate to conceal their misdeeds, blaming assassinations on the insurgents when, in fact, they have nothing to do with them. "It's not always clear who is behind all these killings," says Ms van Bijlert. "Looking at all the killings over the past few months, they're all different."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in