Julia Lovell: Beijing values the Nobels. That's why this hurts

Comment

Friday 08 October 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

China has an unhappy relationship with Nobel Prizes.

After it re-entered the international community in the 1980s, the country developed a publicly acknowledged "Nobel Complex". The Beijing government has seen the prize – like Olympic medals and entry to the World Trade Organisation – as an important source of international "face", as the chance to win global recognition as a modern world power. Since it first emerged, however, China's Nobel Complex has been mired in controversy.

Most years, Chinese scholars, politicians and journalists worry that a Nobel Prize has never been awarded to a Chinese person while resident in China. Ethnically Chinese scientists have won only for breakthroughs made outside their country of birth. The only literature prize given to a Chinese writer was given in 2000 to Gao Xingjian, who now lives in Paris, and whose novels openly denounce Communist policies.

The Chinese government's stony response to yesterday's award to the veteran dissident Liu Xiaobo is partly soured by recollections of previously thwarted Nobel ambitions. But its main concern is not external, but internal, as many Chinese people who would not otherwise necessarily have heard of Liu and his pro-democracy Charter 08 will probably now do so.

Responses to Liu (and his prize) have been vigorously censored in China. But the renowned "Great Firewall" of internet control is porous. Minutes after the announcement of Liu's prize, well-informed Chinese microbloggers were buzzing with jubilation. The Nobel Prize is an award that enjoys unique global prestige: within China, it is often seen as an impartial, international source of recognition. That a dissident of Liu Xiaobo's stature has been honoured is bound to alarm the Beijing government.

Whether the government, more rhetorically uncompromising of late, will follow through on its threat of diplomatic consequences for Norway is not clear. And Liu's own future is just as hazy. Since he was jailed in December last year, his sentencing has mobilised a major international response, but it is hard to predict whether this will have an impact on a Chinese government review of his case. What seems more certain is that the publicity attached to the Nobel will prompt many in China to ask who he is, what he has written, and why he is in prison.

Julia Lovell is the author of 'The Politics of Cultural Capital: China's Quest for a Nobel Prize in Literature'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in