John Mortimer: A drunken barrister has no defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Have we entered a period of middle-aged, middle-class binge drinkers and has this self-indulgence entered the legal profession?
Is the case of a barrister accused of drunkenly exposing himself in front of guests at a wedding celebration typical legal behaviour? Self-exposure has, thankfully, not yet become a habit round the Old Bailey, but the place is not entirely free from drunken barristers.
The most dramatic case occurred when my opponent in a long murder trial got up to make his opening speech. "My Lord, members of the jury," he began, and then fell drunkenly across the desk in front of him.
I used to have a drink with lunch, but I never got drunk. I had another barrister friend who drank a great deal too much one lunch-time, just before he was due to go back into court and make his final speech for the defence in a murder trial. He did so and made what I think was one of the most sensible, truthful and well-phrased final speeches ever heard at the Old Bailey.
"Membersh of the jury," he started off. "This is the moment in the trial when I'm meant to make a reasoned and impassioned speech on behalf of the defendant. This will be followed by a fair and unbiased summing-up by the learned judge. And you will then retire and come to a just verdict. But..." he said, "the truth of the matter is that that I am far too drunk to make a reasoned and impassioned speech on behalf of the defendant, the learned judge has never been known to do a fair and unbiased summing-up and you look far too stupid to come to a just verdict. So I shall sit down."
He did so and was removed from court,and a retrial had to be ordered.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments