John Curtice: Policies reflect rising hostility to immigrants

Sunday 23 January 2005 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Michael Howard's attempt to project immigration into the pre-election campaign is not surprising. Immigration has climbed the public agenda steadily for eight years. Before the 1997 election, just 2 or 3 per cent were telling Mori's pollsters that immigration and race relations were among the most important issues facing Britain. By 2001, the figure had risen to around 10 per cent. For the past year, it has regularly been between a quarter and a third.

Michael Howard's attempt to project immigration into the pre-election campaign is not surprising. Immigration has climbed the public agenda steadily for eight years. Before the 1997 election, just 2 or 3 per cent were telling Mori's pollsters that immigration and race relations were among the most important issues facing Britain. By 2001, the figure had risen to around 10 per cent. For the past year, it has regularly been between a quarter and a third.

Not since 1978 has concern about immigration been so high. Then, the National Front was enjoying some electoral success. Margaret Thatcher sympathised with those who feared being "swamped" by immigrants, and the following year appeared to win over some of that NF support. Now, with the British National Party winning votes, Mr Howard has calculated he should repeat his predecessor's tune.

Immigration is never popular. Even in the quieter mid-1990s, as many as two-thirds favoured cutting the number of immigrants. But as immigration has moved up the agenda, so have demands for a reduction. As many as three-quarters now want immigration cut, according to the British Social Attitudes survey.

Over the past decade, the proportion who believe that immigrants improve British society by bringing in new ideas and cultures has dropped by 20 percentage points. The proportion who think that immigrants cause crime has also sharply increased. Doubtless these sentiments reflect the widespread negative portrayal of asylum-seekers and Muslims.

Labour is not blind to this public mood. The Government has tried to make Britain a less attractive destination for asylum-seekers and to ensure that the applications it does get are processed more quickly. Yet Cabinet Office research shows that public dissatisfaction with asylum and immigration outstrips its discontent with the country's trains, let alone its hospitals.

Expect Mr Howard to continue to mine this discontent.

John Curtice is professor of Politics, Strathclyde University

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in