Jeremy Laurance: Now fight must focus on men with aggressive tumours

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 27 April 2012 18:18 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Surgeons love to operate. It takes guts to slice someone open and to accomplish it you have to be convinced of the value of what you are doing.

That is why the results of the Pivot trial of surgery for prostate cancer, the largest of its kind in the world, were met with silence when they were presented in Paris. It was not what the urologists in the audience wanted to hear. It will not be what patients awaiting surgery will want to hear either. The message of the research is that efforts must now be redoubled to identify and treat men with high risk cancers who will benefit from treatment. In up to half of men the cancer is so slow growing they are likely to die of something else. Advances have been made in the detection and treatment of prostate cancer since the trial began over 15 years ago. Using MRI scans and other techniques, specialists are better at categorising men as high or low risk.

Britain's NHS is also better than the profit driven health system in the US at advising men when surgery is not the right option and it is better to wait and watch. This approach has one great advantage over surgery – there are no side effects.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in