Jemima Khan: Lots of questions but very few answers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lots of questions and lots of replies but very few answers. James Murdoch relied on the PCC Report of November 2009. The PCC relied on News International assurances. It was the usual circular firing squad.
They were coached to the point of catatonia judging by Rupert Murdoch’s expression. He resembles Clive James on smack. What I was after was genuine contrition.
Murdoch Senior was monosyllabic, forgetful and ignorant of the facts. He had never heard of Thurlbeck, was unaware of payments to Max Clifford or Gordon Taylor until after the settlement.
James meanwhile was half Harry Potter, half Hannibal Lecter; his tone measured and conciliatory but his eyes sharky, behind circular glasses.
The questions were the opposite of forensic, apart from those delivered by Tom Watson and Paul Farrelly who were the only interrogators capable of follow-up questions. A particular low-point was Alan Keen’s “Mr Rupert…” It was hugely frustrating.
Just as we were fantasising about a real QC, taking them on with wit and sarcasm, there was the custard pie scuffle and Wendi Deng "intercepts the foam message" - suddenly it had degenerated into the Jeremy Kyle show. The question everyone now wants to know is how security missed that frothy pie in their searches. This is not what the Murdochs were paying the police for.
After the pie attack, Rupert returned looking old and vulnerable. Perception had changed. It all started to feel uncomfortably like geronto-baiting.
It is testimony to the ineptitude of the interrogators and to the “comic protester” that between them they end up making Rupert Murdoch look like a victim and Wendy Deng a heroine.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments