Jacques Chirac: Why not consider a tax on air travel to combat Aids?

From a speech on global poverty at the World Economic Forum in Davos by the French President

Sunday 30 January 2005 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A new global vision of development is required. The Sachs report shows that it is not yet too late to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. In 2006, we will need to mobilise almost $50bn (£26bn) of additional official aid.

A new global vision of development is required. The Sachs report shows that it is not yet too late to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. In 2006, we will need to mobilise almost $50bn (£26bn) of additional official aid.

These amounts may seem considerable. They are, in fact, minimal compared with the wealth generated by globalisation.All countries that do not yet contribute 0.7 percent of their GDP should commit, as France and the United Kingdom have done. But let us be realistic. That will not be enough. France suggests moving simultaneously in two directions. First direction - the International Finance Facility. We are also prepared to look at a similar mechanism to fight Aids, as proposed by the UK. But how to reimburse these loans without reducing international aid or putting too great a strain on budgets?

I propose an experimental levy to finance the fight against Aids. Why Aids? Because, we are failing in the face of this terrible pandemic.

We need to mobilise at least $10bn per year, instead of $6bn, as is the case at present. Let us look into the option of a contribution from international financial transactions. It would enable us to raise $10bn per year. Why not ask countries that maintain bank secrecy to partially compensate for the consequences of world tax evasion, through a levy on flows of foreign capital in and out of their territory. Third avenue. Let us look at [a levy] on the fuel used by air or sea transport. This would be another way to mobilise several billion dollars.

There is yet another way. A small levy on the three billion plane tickets sold each year worldwide. A contribution of one dollar per ticket, for example, would raise at least $3bn, without compromising the economic balance of the sector.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in