Geoffrey Howe: Don't let Congress dazzle you
Taken from the Marion Seligman Memorial Lecture, given by the former Foreign Secretary in London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There has been a sea-change in the attitude of the US towards almost every aspect of today's world. It is important to understand that that transformation extends far beyond a simple, short-term reaction to the shock of 11 September. That was the trigger, letting loose a long planned, and fundamental, "neo-conservative" shift in foreign policy.
Today's America is not one that Churchill would easily recognise. Gone is any commitment to the development, even to the support, of international institutions. Gone, too, is the concept of collective defence, founded upon a doctrine of deterrence. Self-defence has given way to pre-emptive attack. Support for European integration has been in many places displaced by open contempt for the very idea.
Never was it more necessary for the nations of Europe to be working together, to restore balance to the transatlantic reaction to, and management of, a dangerous world. And never was it more necessary for Britain to be playing a leading role - not as an ineffective "partner" of the US but as a keystone of the European pillar. Yet our Prime Minister has tragically allowed himself to be cast very differently. And I think I know one reason why.
Nothing, as I believe, is more likely to impair the judgment of a British prime minister than a standing ovation from both houses of Congress. How much the more so for the young Tony Blair, "shoulder to shoulder" with President Bush days after the slaughter of 11 September.
But how far, and for how long, should that commitment by our country to support American policy-makers have been sustained, apparently so unconditionally and in such increasing isolation?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments