Robert Fisk: Iraqis extend deadline for new constitution

Robert Fisk
Monday 15 August 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Infamous, of course, to the Sunnis who are appalled that the country's Shia Muslim and Kurdish representatives want their own federal states included in the nation and - more to the point - in the constitution, which was supposed to be going before the Iraqi parliament last night. President Bush said the deadline would be met. Mr Blair said the deadline would be met. So did Ibrahim al-Jaafari, the elected Iraqi prime minister.

But last night, Mr Jaafari's officials were talking of a second interim constitution that would allow delegates from the constitutional committees to have at least another two weeks to decide if they would allow virtual independence to the Shia south and centre of Iraq and the Kurdish north - oil-rich areas, unlike the Sunni central provinces.

If all this seems a clever piece of political artwork, it is also probably illegal. Under the first interim constitution, the Jaafari government was supposed to resign if the constitutional deadline was not met and dissolve the parliament. Elections - like those of 30 January - would then have to be held all over again and parliament would then have to take yet another turn at grinding out a constitution.

The reality, of course, is that while Western governments have been watching the process of constitution writing with academic interest, most Iraqis have been regarding the whole thing as a distraction from the daily grind of killings, robbery, energy shortages and corruption. The world of political structures and "democracy" here are thus separated from the world of political action and armed insurgency by walls - real and symbolic - and the West largely, and through a process of imagination, lives within those same walls. Iraq exists outside.

The Americans are perhaps most fearful of the results of any federal constitution. If Kurdistan declares itself a virtual state - which, in reality, it already is - then Turkey is likely to deploy troops along itsborder with Iraq to make sure that Kurdish "statehood" never materialises.

And if the Shias have their federal state in the south, President Bush will have to explain why Iran has so big a hand in influencing the wealthiest of Iraq's oil regions. Those in the know said that large amounts of dollars may soon have to be used to ensure a federal-free constitution. But for that, the committees in the Green Zone will need several more weeks to work out the price.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in