Donald Macintyre: Why sincerity of Israeli leader is doubted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Exactly what Nicolas Sarkozy meant by describing Benjamin Netanyahu as a "liar" is not immediately clear, and the French President is unlikely to prolong the episode by explaining it. But it is safe to assume that Mr Sarkozy has become increasingly unconvinced of Mr Netanyahu's sincerity in saying he is willing to negotiate a two-state solution with the Palestinians. By insisting the Palestinians recognise Israel as a "Jewish state" and by resuming a surge in Jewish settlement building, Mr Netanyahu has given no sign that he envisages the minimum deal the Palestinians could accept.
The source of Mr Obama's frustration is similar, but compounded by two other factors. One is the part played by Israel – and especially Mr Netanyahu, a long-term friend of the Republican right – in US politics, which Mr Obama clearly judges makes it impossible to apply the pressure he would like on the Israeli leader. And the other may be a sense of ingratitude. Mr Obama has secured virtually nothing in return for his generosity, from opposing the Palestinian bid for UN recognition to a repeated delivery of weaponry and security co-operation. The candour of the presidential exchange may be surprising; the content much less so.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments