Donald Macintyre: Inhabitants of 'Area C' have been neglected

Donald Macintyre
Wednesday 11 January 2012 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If nothing else the EU report is a sign that the international community has woken up to the problems of Area C – including what it describes bluntly as the "forced transfer" of Palestinians from their land.

So too are the protests to Israel that have been launched by the EU's Ambassador, Andrew Standley, that up to 2,300 Bedouin herdsmen living in the area of a planned corridor between Jerusalem and the Maale Adumim settlement will be forced to move.

Some of the inhabitants of Area C are among the most beleaguered Palestinians. Much of their land is hemmed in by settlements and the military zones protecting them. They tend to be neglected by the Palestinian Authority. And they have hardly been a major focus for the international community, as the EU report more or less admits. That may be changing.

Certainly, the case of the Bedouin is evidence that the problems are by no means confined to remoter areas. For the Bedouin's possible displacement to an area near a rubbish dump in Abu Dis, adjacent to Jerusalem, would create a new "fact on the ground", possibly making way for the construction of settler homes in Area C, which Israel would then fight to locate within its borders in any two-state agreement. The dispute over the Bedouin underlines the report's argument that Area C is a crucial determinant of the viability of any future Palestinian state. Area C was always meant to be temporary; but the longer Israel's entrenchment of the settler presence in the West Bank continues, the harder it will be to unravel.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in