David Laws: the liberal values we need to reclaim

From a speech by the Liberal Democrat economics spokesman to the 'Independent' fringe meeting at the party's conference in Brighton

Tuesday 23 September 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Economic liberalism is in the very roots of our party - in the great 19th- and 20th-century battles for free trade and for breaking up the monopolies. Yet sometimes you would think that these great principles - free trade, competition, the power of markets, the benefits of choice - were anathema to some Liberal Democrats.

We should, in my view, reclaim these liberal values and principles - but use them for our ends - fighting poverty, inequality of opportunity and third-rate state monopoly provision. If you don't believe me, think about what the dismantling of Western trade barriers and agricultural subsidies would mean for so many poor countries in the developing world.

Look at the huge growth in prosperity enabled by the market economy, and compare that with the failure of socialism. Of course, money matters hugely in delivering better services - look how much money is spent on private education and private health. But please don't tell me that choice is irrelevant when, as a constituency MP, I see those at the bottom of the income pile wait for months, often years, to receive the NHS treatment they need. Would a system with a greater element of choice and competition really allow people to wait, often in pain and discomfort, for up to two years before treatment?

Of course, there is a huge amount achieved by our NHS, our schools system and our police. But I believe that more can still be achieved, most particularly for those least able to opt out of state provision, by widening choice and competition in our public services, and marrying social liberalism with economic liberalism.

We ought to be thinking about how we can make choice, competition and accountability work for all of our society, not just a privileged minority. Because the Tories are foolishly once again parading policies that do little more than offer the affluent minority an escape route from collectivism, we should not assume that choice can only ever work for the wealthy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in