David Hannay: Reasons to be optimistic for the United Nations
From a speech at the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Britain's former ambassador to the UN
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is no point in gainsaying the fact that 2003 was a terrible year for the UN. Over Iraq the organisation was paralysed by disagreement in the Security Council and deeply divided over the legality of the decision to go to war. What reason is there to believe that in 2004 and 2005 it should be possible to put these tragic events behind us and to set out on a new path, backed by a new consensus?
The first reason for some qualified optimism is that the UN has, as so often in the past, demonstrated its fundamental indispensability, not just in words but in action too. It is playing an essential role in the political process designed to lay the foundations of a new, democratic Iraq, and doing so at the invitation of the US, which had earlier cold-shouldered it.
A second reason is that Iraq now looks a good deal more like a one-off event than like the precursor of several others, which both anxious commentators and triumphalist neo-conservatives were ready to proclaim it at the time. Whatever one may think about the legality of the coalition's decision to go to war, it is surely clear that neither the rationale nor the legal justification for the US/UK action can easily be replicated anywhere else.
Nor is any attempt being made to do so in the cases of North Korea and Iran. Moreover events in Iraq are stretching the resources of the world's only remaining superpower to an extent not previously anticipated, and demonstrating that the gap in effectiveness between a unilateral and a collective approach is not so wide as has often been asserted by the UN's critics.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments