Christopher Frayling: Artists are needed to teach
From the 2002 Royal Academy dinner speech by the Rector of the Royal College of Arts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I want to alert the Academy to a few things that are currently going on in arts education post-school, my own neck of the woods.
The first is its huge expansion. We need to talk about professional standards in this climate. There's the constant regulation – not to say regimentation – of the sector. And then there's the regular measurement of research within art education
Which leads me to perhaps the most important issue of all. The sad decline in the number of part-time or visiting professional artists who are willing or able to give time to arts courses in higher education.
For much of the 20th century, the involvement of visiting professional artists was taken for granted, perhaps too much. No longer. Of course, you can't blame them. The classes are probably huge, there are lots of forms to fill in, the ideology of instant success makes the students difficult to teach – and some of them want desperately to be understood before they've made anything to understand. They haven't twigged that an unlived life is not necessarily worth examining. You don't get much money for teaching.
But these things said, the involvement of leading professionals – rather than career academics – in the education of young artists is the key to the success of our system of arts education.
I say this to the Academicians assembled here tonight, in all humility. Please continue to put something back into our education system: it's where you came from, and it desperately needs what only you can offer.
To help to define professional standards at a time of massive expansion; to cut through the ideology of instant success and to give the benefit of a life lived through art. But above all, to protect the students from new styles of dogma, new forms of regimentation, new kinds of insularity. And to build bridges between thinkers and doers.
David Hockney once said to me – and he was so right – that art education means being taught by people who have strong views – not necessarily views the student agrees with, but strong views. Lots of them. Views which help the young artist to find his or her own voice, by reacting to them. The cardinal sin is for young artists to be surrounded by sponges, which just absorb everything and go with the flow.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments