Christina Patterson: A row that shouldn't hide an important truth: poetry matters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Perhaps bringing in Hitler was going a bit far.
Perhaps suggesting that the people who were in charge of corporate governance, and who seemed to be very defensive, and who seemed to be saying things that seemed to conflict with things that other people were saying, and who seemed to be spending a lot of money on legal advice from a law firm called Harbottle & Lewis, and also a lot of money on PR, and who obviously spent quite a lot of time preparing for their public grilling, were Nazis, and that what they were doing was part of a great masterplan, was going a little bit far.
But you can see why you'd want to. You can see, for example, why you might be tempted to post a little clip of Downfall on YouTube, with subtitles you'd written, which implied that the people you were talking about were deranged. You can see why you might think that if you didn't laugh about the people behaving strangely, who kept saying they couldn't say things "for legal reasons", you might get quite cross. Particularly since their surname wasn't Murdoch, and the money they were spending on the law firm Murdoch also used wasn't actually theirs. Since it had, in fact, been supplied by taxpayers, and poets.
You can see why you might think it was quite funny that the board of a small organisation called the Poetry Society, which is funded by a grant from the Arts Council, and by grants from trusts and foundations, and by membership fees from poets, managed to turn a conflict between two members of staff into a little earthquake, and one which would lead to the director resigning, and the finance manager resigning, and the president resigning, andthe chairman resigning, and a lot of poets getting very upset, and signing petitions, and calling for a special meeting, and telling the board they had to stand down.
You can see why you might think it was quite funny that an organisation people probably thought was run from a kitchen table, or maybe the backroom of a library (but which is, in fact, run from a nice old building, with a cosy café, in Covent Garden) should be talked about on YouTube, and also on Twitter, and also on blogs, and also in national newspapers, and also on the news. And you can see why some people might think it was quite funny, after the director resigned, and the finance manager resigned, and the president resigned, and the chairman resigned, and then, after the noisy meeting, the whole board resigned (though the other person involved in the row didn't resign) that the Arts Council said it was going to stop its funds.
I don't think it's funny. I did think that the Downfall clip, which has now disappeared from YouTube, was funny, and I did think that the cartoon of Rebekah Brooks following the Poetry Society's extraordinary general meeting on Twitter was funny, and I did think that one of the board member's comments, that "quite a lot of poets seem to be rather bloody unbalanced", was quite funny. But, as someone who used to run the Poetry Society, who was, in fact the first woman since Muriel Spark to run the Poetry Society, I also think it's quite sad.
I think it's sad that a good director, and a good finance manager, felt they had to leave, and now don't have jobs. I think it's sad that a board that didn't seem to know much about management seems to have turned an organisation that was doing quite well, and that had just got an increase in its Arts Council funding, into an organisation that looks as though it was run by people who couldn't run an egg and spoon race. And I think it's sad that the whole messy, stupid business has made people think that poetry is a joke.
In Iran, where, although it's called an "Islamic Republic", only 4 per cent of the country goes to Friday prayers, but everyone recites the poems of Hafez, as if his words, written 700 years ago, were written on their hearts, people don't think poetry is a joke. In Russia, where poets were sent to rot and die in gulags, and later recited their poems in football stadia, because so many people thought the words spoke of a freedom they could only dream of, people didn't think poetry was a joke. In Egypt, and Bahrain, and Syria, where people marched, and still march, and even die, for the chance to have some say in the leadership of their country, and where they recite poems to give each other hope, and to give each other strength, they don't think poetry is a joke.
In schools, and youth clubs, where teenagers who may never have been praised by a teacher, or passed an exam, discover, with help from professional poets, that they can write and perform poems, which they sometimes go on to do in public, and at festivals, and discover that they are not stupid, and not lazy, and not, as people sometimes tell them, useless at everything, as part of a project now called Slambassadors, which I'm proud to say I started, people don't think poetry is a joke.
And in Norway, where parents are beginning to bury their children, and are searching for the right words at a time when it's almost impossible to find words, I don't think they'll think poetry is a joke. I think they might find some solace in words like these:
"And did you get what/ you wanted from this life, even so?/ I did./ And what did you want?/ To call myself beloved, to feel myself/ beloved on the earth."
The words are by Raymond Carver. They're a poem called "Late Fragment". I used them when I buried my sister.
Extracted from All of Us: The Collected Poems by Raymond Carver. Harvill Press, £16.99, © Tess Gallagher, 1996
Concerto in strange feathery thing
Perhaps it's a sign of getting older, or perhaps it's because we all turn into our parents in the end, and my childhood was filled with the operatic shrieks of some Brünnhilde blaring out from what my father insisted on calling the "wireless", but I've shed my childhood hatred of classical music, and now rarely listen to anything else. I even like going to concerts, but I do find them quite strange. All that mincing, and bowing, and funny little shuffles, and funny little coughs. It reminds me of trips to Windsor Safari Park – the dolphins, and the baboons.
And the clothes! At a concert at the Wigmore Hall this week, the pianist came on stage in a strange feathery thing that made her look like Icarus. In the second half, she wore a red tailcoat, like a ringmaster. The music was exquisite, and so was the playing, but the question I couldn't get out of my head was "why?"
Are there special shops for classical musicians? Or does all that peering at squiggles do something to your eyes? Or your sanity? I really want to know.
Do you really need to slum it, Prime Minister?
The "staycation" was bad enough. All those pictures of politicians shivering on British beaches, or grimly clutching ice creams. But then someone – perhaps it was No 10's "blue-sky" thinker – said it was OK for politicians to go abroad, as long as they used "budget airlines". And so we had the Camerons' cut-price minibreak to Malaga, and now we hear they're off to Tuscany, but flying on – you've guessed it. Quite why a man who earns six times the national average feels he needs to fly on airlines that seem to be modelled on Abu Ghraib is anyone's guess. But if he wants us to boost the economy with a bit of spending, this doesn't seem the best way to start.
c.patterson@independent.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments