Both sides could learn from each other in dispute between Gove and teachers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is perhaps no surprise to find Education Secretary Michael Gove and hundreds of teachers at loggerheads over his proposed national curriculum reforms.
Mr Gove made it plain at the outset that he planned a vigorous concentration on the basics of learning – which his critics say will see schools return to a more traditional era of education akin to the 1950s and stifle creativity in the classroom.
To my mind, it is essential to include both elements in a successful curriculum – a rigid adherence to rote learning is unlikely to spark a love of learning among those who struggle most to succeed, while an absence of knowledge of the building blocks of learning is equally likely to sentence pupils to an unfulfilled future.
Michael Gove has repeatedly stressed that he believes his reforms to the curriculum will give teachers more free time to devote to what they want to teach their pupils. His Department for Education has said it is reforming the system to promote deeper cognitive skills which depend on solid foundations.
He has, though, failed to convince many teachers that this is the case.
If he can – perhaps by spelling out in more detail what his new vision of the curriculum will mean to a subject in a given week – then the future for the curriculum will not be as bleak as some of his sternest critics believe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments