Bill Emmott: The rise of Asia is not a simple matter of East versus West
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is a tendency, particularly in Washington and occasionally in Western Europe, to think of the rise of Japan, China and India as being in some way a matter of power shifting from the Western powers to the East. My belief, and the essence of the argument that I have made in my new book, Rivals, is that this is wrong. We should recognise this process as being one that is bringing about a rivalry, a competition, not between West and East, but between East and East.
In economic terms, these nations are becoming more integrated: trade between them is increasing as a share of their total trade, up to nearly 50 per cent now, which is lower than the EU's 65 per cent, but just above the intra-regional trade inside the North American free trade area. The Asian countries are more integrated because they are conscious commercial competitors and therefore, I think, stimulating the reforms in all three countries.
Inherent in the relationships between these three powers is a mixture of economic competition, growing commercial relationships and integration, but also political rivalry. One of the people I spoke to was someone who then became Japan's Foreign Minister, and I asked him what I should think about tensions between China and Japan. These were strong at the time I was speaking to him, with violence at football matches, big protests about visits to the Tokyo War Shrine, and things of that nature. He said; "Ah, I don't know why you Westerners are so surprised by all this tension between China and Japan. After all, China and Japan have hated each other for a thousand years – why should it be any different now?" I mention this because that man is now Japan's Prime Minister, Taro Aso.
In other words, this is a region of great hope for us economically, which is reducing poverty at a faster rate than anywhere else in economic history, which is now rich in capital and can produce some upward momentum at a time when the world economy will need support. But it has severe political question marks hanging over it. I cannot resist finishing with Groucho Marx's response to someone when asked whether he'd had a wonderful evening. His answer was that he'd had a wonderful evening but this wasn't it! That is the danger for Asia.
Taken from a Gresham College lecture by the former editor of 'The Economist'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments