Antony Gormley: Artists must remain free of ideological control

From a speech by the sculptor at the Art Newspaper debate at London's Royal Academy

Wednesday 07 July 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I think that my responsibility is to be an artist - to do what I can about what the last work I made tells me to do. My responsibility rests within my work. The morality comes from a daily practice of that work.

I think that my responsibility is to be an artist - to do what I can about what the last work I made tells me to do. My responsibility rests within my work. The morality comes from a daily practice of that work.

I'm concerned about whose morality I am supposed to be upholding when we start worrying about an artists's responsibility to anything wider than the very real responsibility of being an artist, which is - even more so since the great fights of the 20th century - a responsibility to be free of any ideological control.

So, my response to the world is to try to make my own. The relationship between what happens in the studio and what happens beyond its walls is one I don't want to fully understand. It's osmotic. What we do in recreating a world is the furthest from an illustration of the real world that you can get. To occupy that world fully is the only responsibility that we have.

There's been a strange osmosis since the election of this government, where artists are suddenly looked on as free social workers who can somehow massage the collective body, and I may well have been cast in that role. The fact is that something like the Angel of the North came about simply by me having made an angel once, and somebody having seen it, and thinking that they might like to make one permanently.

I'm not sure the Angel is really a monument, I'm not sure it upholds any definable moral values. I think its value is that it is simply an imaginative object in space at large, that might invite people to reflect upon their own condition, in the same way I might reflect on mine.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in