Amol Rajan: The Baroness, the comment and the unholy trinity

FreeView from the editors at i

Amol Rajan
Thursday 16 February 2012 06:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of the great privileges of being a journalist is that you develop a discerning eye for propaganda masquerading as journalism. A fine example of this occurred in the Daily Telegraph on Tuesday, when Tory Chairman Baroness Warsi, wrote a column in which she claimed "militant secularisation" reminiscent of "totalitarian regimes" is "taking hold" of societies like ours.

Both she and the paper were shamelessly pandering to the baser instincts of Telegraph readers, tapping into their growing fear that Britain is being taken away from them. Having spent some time on a Comment desk, I know how these things work. An adviser to Warsi thinks up a provocative, headline-friendly phrase. He or she clears it with Warsi, who in turn clears it with No 10. The Comment desk at the Telegraph is given plenty of notice, so that it can work out how to draw attention to this great property. And – hey presto – a write-off by the Political Editor makes the front page, a supportive leader is written and the Today programme talks of little else.

Perhaps now is the moment for a reminder that the absurdly-titled Baroness owes her position not just in our legislature, but in Cabinet, to being the beneficiary of racial, religious and gender discrimination. She stood for election in 2005, but there was a swing against the Conservatives. David Cameron decided he must promote her regardless. If any readers want to pretend that her taxpayer-funded job isn't a consequence of the Prime Minister's need for a Muslim woman to chair his party as part of its re-branding exercise under his leadership, be my guest. As for her actual claim on religious persecution, it is so soul-crunchingly stupid that no serious person could believe it. To invoke totalitarianism – with its gas chambers, gulags and Gestapo – to describe the condition of the faithful in modern, liberal Britain is a disgraceful and inflammatory act, casting doubt on her fitness for public office (if not for Tory chairmanship). As my colleague Mark Steel put it in his unbeatable column yesterday: "If you're going to complain that religion is becoming 'marginal'... it's genius to do it when you're [leading] a Cabinet visit to the Pope."And isn't it ironic that precisely those right-wingers who shrieked about the perils of multiculturalism – a harmful ideology – are now reduced to playing the victim card themselves? Far from improving the quality of public discussion on religion, this Warsi debacle is that unholy trinity: a failure of journalism, democracy and common sense.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in