Alex Fusco: Those thirsting for drama would call this a drought

iWriters

Alex Fusco
Tuesday 17 April 2012 06:45 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was announced yesterday that the Environment Agency has "declared drought" in more than half the country – alarmist phrasing doing little to douse the panic currently blazing across Southern England.

Was there really any need to "declare" drought? Was someone attempting to smuggle it into the country unnoticed? Were we teetering on the brink of a state of drought, and a final week without so much of a trickle of rainfall led to such a monumental announcement? I doubt it.

And "drought"? Frankly, with the richness of the English language, there must be another word to describe a lack of water on such a mild scale. Surely "drought" cannot be used to describe both the situation in East Africa, in which parched earth, famine and cholera threaten the lives of millions, and the slight inconvenience of a hosepipe ban in East Anglia? What next – will the BBC be sending Lenny Henry to Hampshire to make a short film about cracked and malnourished front lawns?

First-world problems do not merit third-world terminology. I don't declare a famine every time the cupboards are running low – I go shopping. Whilst the cost of transporting water apparently renders such an approach impractical, surely it is possible to secure a couple of tankers, from Scotland or Wales, on the cheap? The two countries are notorious for an abysmally high rainfall – they must be hoarding the stuff, saving it for a...oh no, wait.

In order to counteract the effects of such a drought the Environment Agency is implementing a hose-pipe ban across a great swathe of the country. Those caught sneaking out in the dead of night to water their lawn or wash mud off their hub-caps can expect a £1,000 fine. Obviously, EA officials won't actually be prowling the streets at night to catch these criminals in flagrant disregard of the new regulations; instead, they will be relying upon the obsessively law-abiding citizens living nearby, encouraging them to inform on their environmentally-negligent neighbours. As the grass stops growing, the growers start grassing, it would seem.

On a final note, in order to counteract such a debilitating water shortage, the Environment Agency is hoping for a prolonged period of rainfall during the winter of 2012-13. In a country where the climate encourages ice-cream van drivers to emigrate, and the 'cold snap' bites in October and doesn't let go until April, we must now hope for four months of monsoons to prevent another "drought" ravaging the country again next year.

In all honesty, I'd rather take another hosepipe ban.

Alex Fusco is studying English and creative writing at the University of Warwick.

Simon Kelner is away

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in