You might not agree with her view, but it's good to see Page 3 girl Peta Todd arguing against Harriet Harman

As she campaigns to end the four decade-long tradition, Harriet Harman mocked Page 3 girls yesterday, but shouldn't we at least give the girls a voice?

Laura Davis
Friday 05 October 2012 12:08 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In her closing speech to the party conference yesterday, Harriet Harman mocked Page 3 girls.

In a squeaky voice, Harman said “Hattie, 62, from Camberwell...and here’s today’s news in briefs”.

The MP for Camberwell and Peckham is campaigning to have Page 3 scrapped, but The Sun seems to think this was "a clear dig at the gorgeous girls who brighten up Britain’s favourite paper". (Debatable.)

One positive thing to see from this, is that Page 3 girl Peta Todd has fought her corner, arguing why her profession is valid career choice.

In response to Harman's words on the topic, Todd argued in
The Sun today that some women who have a harder start in life use their looks to make a fair income:

"Did it not occur to you that some young women decide independently that modelling is the industry they want to work in?", she asked.

Earlier this year, I wrote about Page 3 and how my main gripe was not with the girls who take part, but the paper for giving them an "opinion" which generally stood to undermine them. News in Briefs was just used as a way to excuse having boobs plastered in the paper. Either feature the breasts and make your case for it, or don't. Combining the view of a topless model on current political issues isn't to enhance the public's understanding of matters.

On their website, they list the girls with accompanying comments like "You can’t expect me to have brains as well?” and "With boobs like this what else could I do?". Vapid, innuendo-laden comments that only act to insult the girls. I also spoke to former Page 3 girl Nicola McLean, who said she frequently just told the editors to write it for her:

"Most of the girls aren’t really dumb, so it shouldn’t make them out to be dumb. Does anyone read it? Do they care what a Page 3 girl says about politics? No."

Peta Todd has been vocal in campaigning for various charities in the past, so I pointed out it would have been interesting to hear her opinion on some of the issues she defends. The Sun have at least finally given her a platform to defend her profession.

At Independent Voices, we recently ran the exclusive from Lucy Anne Holmes on why she started the No More Page 3 Campaign. With over 40,000 signatures, the idea clearly has a lot of support behind it. It's hard not to agree with a lot of the points made against the 40 year-old tradition in a family newspaper.

Todd responded to anti-Page 3ers saying: "Essentially it’s a cheap shot, an easy target. It’s a doddle to make fun of Page 3 and you think you’re oh-so funny. But it’s such a trivial issue and not worthy of the platform you insist on giving it over and again."

Whether you agree with running Page 3 and think the debate is trivial, or indeed think it's sexist and should be banned, one encouraging thing to come from this is seeing the girls join the debate and offering an opinion, instead of us making it for them.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in