We would never have known John Bercow claimed £172 for a taxi were it not for the Freedom of Information Act
But FoI requests could be curtailed following a new review of the Act
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Discovering fresh details of the Speaker’s travel and accommodation costs would never have been possible but for the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act.
Even with the legislation in place, it has been a long battle to learn that his chauffeur-driven lift up the road left the taxpayer £172 worse off.
A landmark Court of Appeal judgement three years ago ruled that copies of original documents should be released under FoI – and not just a summary of the information they contained.
Supporters of FoI argue that such material should be in the public domain because it relates directly to the expenditure of taxpayers’ money and the conduct of public officials.
Sceptics have included the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, the expenses watchdog, which had resisted the move on the grounds of the huge cost of compiling and releasing the paperwork.
But such FoI requests could be curtailed following a new review of the Act, announced by ministers last week. There are fears that the commission re-examining the legislation will recommend tighter controls. The result could be a veil drawn over lavish spending by our elected representatives.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments