Tinder may have inadvertently hit its self-destruct button by charging older users more

The dating app is cashing in on our deep-seated fears of dying alone

Nash Riggins
Tuesday 03 March 2015 11:39 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dating can be an absolute nightmare. Trying to find Mr or Mrs Right is to experience near constant disappointment – and for many, it’s a stress-inducing race against time to find true love.

Perhaps that’s why dating app Tinder has exploded in popularity over the last couple of years. The simple tool has transformed the chore of dating into a cheeky game that requires little time and virtually no effort. Better yet, it doesn’t cost a penny – until now.

This week, developers are celebrating the launch of Tinder’s premium paid-for sister app: Tinder Plus. The frilly version comes with a whole host of new features, such as the ability to find partners in foreign countries, unlimited right-swipes, and a rewind button to recover lost love. For horny teens and overworked recent grads, those fancy features will cost as little as £3.99 a month. For those over the age of 28, Tinder Plus will set you back a whopping £14.99 per month.

Sound like age discrimination? That’s because it is – and it’s not going to do the app any favours, either.

It’s easy to see why the company has decided to go premium. Tinder isn’t a scruffy, idealistic startup. It was actually developed by the same online dating empire that brought us Match.com and OkCupid. To them, Tinder has been a brilliantly successful market research experiment. Now, it’s time to monetise the system. Yet the company’s rationale is a little obtuse.

Execs have argued that an age-based pay structure must be introduced as a sort of student discount that will allow skint kids to look for love without breaking the bank. Fair enough, you might think. Yet by charging silver foxes almost four times more than underage teens that probably shouldn’t be using this app in the first place, Tinder is effectively cashing in on our age-induced insecurities.

Think about it: not only do thirty-somethings have a lot more money to blow than your run-of-the-mill college student, but they’re also a lot more desperate to find a life partner. Youth is slipping away, their sex appeal is diminishing and parental demands for grandchildren are increasing in frequency. So, logic dictates these daters will be far more likely to fork over serious money for costly premium services. App developers know that, and they’re gambling on a substantial number of aging users hopping blindly onto the paywall bandwagon out of utter desperation.

To be honest, that’s probably a bet Tinder will end up losing.

Okay, so it’s worth pointing out that the free version of the app isn’t going anywhere (yet). But there are plenty of rumours swirling about concerning the introduction of adverts, and even a daily cap on the number of swipes you’re able to make. It makes perfect sense. By denying users the basic functionality to which they’ve grown accustomed, the company clearly hopes to push people onto its premium service. But if there’s one thing the internet hates, it’s getting pushed into a corner.

To a vast majority of young users, Tinder isn’t a serious dating platform worthy of time and money – it’s a sexually-motivated game that occasionally ends at third base. On some smartphones, it even gets automatically filed into your gaming folder. And whilst some addicts might be totally willing to pay a monthly fee in order to play that game, chances are most people will simply move on to the next big thing. In fact, data analysts at Morgan Stanley reckon no more than five or six percent of Tinder users will actually end up becoming paying members.

So, where does that leave us? On a precipice it seems. For the past couple of years, Tinder has been a fun, flirty way to spend a few minutes while you’re waiting for the bus. But now, developers want to change that game by cashing in on our deep-seated fears of dying alone. That’s not fun, it’s not sexy and it’s not great marketing. From where I’m standing, it looks like Tinder has just inadvertently bumped into its own self-destruct button – and so romantic app developers should be licking their lips. A huge market is about to open up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in