The only good election campaign is one that does its job

Many of these “experts” were paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by the political parties for their advice. Much of this was a waste of mone

Danny Rogers
Monday 11 May 2015 04:31 EDT
Comments
Miliband in Salmond's pocket for the Toy campaign poster
Miliband in Salmond's pocket for the Toy campaign poster (AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Since the general election I have heard many so-called experts talk about how “Labour ran the best campaign, but…”

This is crazy. The only measure of a good campaign is whether it achieved its goal. And all except for the Conservatives’ and the SNP’s patently failed to do so.

Many of these “experts” were paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by the political parties for their advice. Much of this was a waste of money.

The Lib Dem and Labour campaigns should be categorised as “poor”. We won’t remember the ads and the PR stunts failed to cut through. Indeed, the “Milistone” project – a stone plinth carved with Labour pledges – was ridiculed. Mr Miliband’s wooing of Russell Brand may have solidified Labour’s vote among London’s youth, but it failed to have an impact outside the capital. The Lib Dem’s “vote tactically” message was inevitably impotent.

The Tories’ campaign was negative and obsessed with the economy, but it was effective enough to win the party a majority of seats. Mr Cameron getting “pumped up” on the hustings, while a tad ridiculous, did boost Tory polling. And the highpoint was the early poster with Ed Miliband in Alec Salmond’s pocket; it set a media narrative about the SNP that endured in England.

However, the fact that Mr Cameron failed even to win as many seats as an embattled Tony Blair achieved (355) in 2005 disqualifies it as a “great campaign”.

The only one to admire was the SNP’s. We can say this because the SNP took minimal media flak and (that acid test again) virtually all the seats in Scotland.

Danny Rogers is group editor-in-chief of Brand Republic Group

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in