Surely, Jeremy Clarkson's number must finally be up?
Can't British diplomats ban 'Top Gear' from visiting their countries, in anticipation of all the trouble?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Because we British are on the whole an apologetic bunch, I would like to take this opportunity to say that we're sorry, to the rest of the world, for Jeremy Clarkson.
Sorry to Argentina, from where the Top Gear team was recently chased for driving around with a number plate that seemed to refer to the 1982 Falklands War. Clarkson insists the plates were a coincidence. Having already played the little boy who cried wolf by tweeting, "For once, we did nothing wrong" (that must be a strange feeling), yesterday he wrote that a particular BBC boss doesn't like him and definitely would have sacked him if he thought he'd meant it. Really? He doesn't seem to have had much success before.
For instance, there was that time in Burma when Clarkson managed to offend most of Asia by using a dated racial slur that inexplicably made the final edit. Ofcom ruled that the comment broke broadcasting rules, but a clip of "Bridge" is still available to watch on the BBC website, albeit with the insulting bit cut, and users warned that it "contains material that may offend", and the Burma Special is for sale from the BBC shop at £6.99.
Nor when it came to Romania, Germany, Mexico, the United States and India… countries that have all suffered the indignity of a little visit or some casual racism from Clarkson and pals. In Alabama, the team was pelted with rocks after painting their pick-up trucks with offensive slogans. Still Clarkson wasn't fired. In 2011, the Mexican ambassador complained about "offensive, xenophobic and humiliating" comments. Clarkson's still there.
If the British Council is a way of spreading diplomacy through education, culture and the English language, Top Gear is its antithesis: supported by the BBC to travel the world making everybody hate us. So why are we still letting them? Can't UK ambassadors ban the programme from visiting their countries, in anticipation of all the trouble it will cause? Can't licence payers say: "not in our name"?
The Top Gear press office didn't return my calls, but recent reports say Clarkson and the BBC are negotiating a £12m deal to keep him for another three years, and reiterated the rumour that Clarkson will be fired if he makes "one more offensive remark". The BBC director of television, Danny Cohen, has apparently instigated an investigation to ask "is there a wider cultural problem at Top Gear?" and "does Top Gear meet the standards expected from the BBC?" I'd say "yes", and "no". There's a price to pay, even for little boys who cry wolf.
We all know that Top Gear brings in a lot of money for the BBC, which could explain why the corporation behaves like a crap parent who never follows through with discipline. But this is embarrassing for everyone. Top Gear reflects badly on Britain. It's time for the BBC to show how sorry it is and finally get rid of Clarkson.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments