Stephen Ward’s trial was disgraceful. There can be no justification for it
Ward was made a scapegoat for the Profumo affair which became so toxic for the Macmillan government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mandy Rice-Davies was a witness, together with Christine Keeler, at the Old Bailey trial of Dr Stephen Ward, accused of living off their earnings as prostitutes. Neither was a prostitute and both women, in fact, lived off Ward’s earnings as a society osteopath and successful portrait painter. The criminal charges were a nonsense and the truth about the trial is still being covered up: the files which contain “some sensational items that would be embarrassing if released” will not be released until 2046 – a century on from the birth date of the trial’s youngest witness, Mandy Rice-Davies.
Ward was charged with crimes for which there was no evidence that he or anyone else had committed. At a time of moral panic, after John Profumo’s lies, it was possible for a prosecutor to condemn him as “a thoroughly filthy fellow” and for a judge to manipulate legal rules to ensure a conviction. The judge told the jury that it could convict Ward because none of his friends had come forward to support him – a preposterous direction, because his friends were afraid of reputational ruin.
Ward was made a scapegoat for the Profumo affair which became so toxic for the Macmillan government. He knew that Profumo had lied to Parliament about his relationship with Keeler and he was threatening to expose the truth. Sir Henry Brooke, the home secretary, personally ordered the head of Scotland Yard to “get” Ward – a breach of the rule that government ministers must not direct police operations.
A corrupt Scotland Yard officer, Inspector Herbert, had Mandy Rice-Davies imprisoned on a trumped-up charge and agreed to her release only if she would testify against Ward. At the committal proceedings she insisted that he had never influenced her to have sex with anyone.
In recent years, Mandy had been active in attempting to clear Stephen Ward’s name. She fought an eventually successful battle against the National Archives, which were so determined to aid and abet the Profumo cover-up. The trial of Stephen Ward was a disgraceful event. There can be no justification, other than a cringing regard for the reputation of a long-gone establishment, for the National Archives to withhold papers evidencing this miscarriage of justice.
Geoffrey Robertson QC is the author of ‘Stephen Ward Was Innocent, OK’
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments