Sir Tim Hunt's sexist remarks: Nice guy or not, the damage has been done

His views seem to parallel those found in strict Islamic societies where women are segregated lest they inflame men’s passions

Professor Dorothy Bishop
Thursday 11 June 2015 11:26 EDT
Comments
Tim Hunt has set back the cause of women in science
Tim Hunt has set back the cause of women in science (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For anyone who has been attempting to encourage women in science, Professor Hunt’s comments were disappointing to say the least. His views seem to parallel those found in strict Islamic societies where women are segregated lest they inflame men’s passions.

Most of the women who know Tim Hunt personally think he is a decent human being. In the light of his comments I had assumed he was one of those arrogant alpha males who is puffed up with their own self-importance and who maintains a coterie of attractive postdoctoral females. I’ve occasionally encountered this type: all too ready with a hand on the knee of any attractive woman. But apparently, Hunt is not at all like that.

However, the fact that he is not a predatory ogre should not blind us to the damage he has done. With one short speech he has set back the cause of women in science. It is particularly upsetting that his comments come just at the time when the Royal Society is making strenuous efforts for greater diversity. I fear the Society is damaged by this outburst from one of its more prominent fellows.

I think we do need to make a proportionate response. Twitterstorms can be dreadful, rather like lynch mobs. Hunt has not committed any crime. However, I don’t think we should let this go by just as someone being indiscreet, blunt, or frivolous. The comments get at the heart of bias against women in science: the notion that we can’t be serious contenders because we are too emotional, and, even worse, we distract the men from their science by our sexual allure.

My suggestion is that the Royal Society should debar him from any committee that makes decisions about fellowships, prizes or policy. I have no doubt that, nice guy as everyone confirms he is, Hunt does his best not to be prejudiced, but his view of women makes him inappropriate in these roles.

The author is a Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology at the University of Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in