Prime Minister’s Questions: Another game of smokes and daggers

Ed Miliband and others ask rhetorical questions of David Cameron

John Rentoul
Wednesday 29 October 2014 11:53 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

What a brilliant game of “smokes and daggers” that was. A phrase minted by Bertie Ahern, the Irish former prime minister, that ought to be used in politics more. Ed Miliband, rising once more to enthusiastic ironic cheers of “More!” from the Conservatives, wanted to know why the Prime Minister was putting off the vote on the European Arrest Warrant. It was because of the Rochester and Strood by-election on 20 November, he said, answering his own question.

The vote will be held before the by-election, said David Cameron. Then he did that annoying Punch-and-Judy thing – yes, there are some of us who remember when he wanted the end of the beach puppet show – of saying that Miliband’s “questions have just collapsed”. Yes, we had all noticed that and were rather enjoying it, but pointing it out just looks like gloating. Like that footballer who broke his back doing a celebratory somersault, it rather takes the shine off a point scored.

Cameron’s decision to hold the vote before the by-election is a small act of defiance – of leadership, almost – in that he knows that Kelly Tolhurst, the Tory candidate, is going to lose. One moment he was throwing everything at the by-election, including an expensive all-postal open primary election to choose the candidate, now his mood is, “Que sera, sera.” The more important thing is that Cameron has decided that the European Arrest Warrant is sensible, and that he is going to be embarrassed by a big Tory rebellion over it whenever the vote is held, so he might as well get it over with and do the right thing.

Miliband ignored the collapse of his question and welcomed the fact that Cameron would be joining him in the lobby voting for the European Arrest Warrant, and said it would be “two parties working together in the national interest – or maybe, given the Prime Minister’s backbenchers, one and a half parties working together in the national interest”, because a lot of Tory backbenchers would vote against it. That might have been quite a wounding line, if Cameron hadn’t so thoroughly pre-empted it.

After that, the exchanges between the two of them descended into the “smokes and daggers” proper – a lot of shouty stock phrases in no particular order. We inherited a mess, said Cameron. He promised tens of thousands, said Miliband. He forgot immigration in his speech. He promised, he has failed.

Through the smoke it was possible to make out some arguments, but they were poor ones. Cameron had promised to get immigration down but cannot control the free movement of workers in the EU, as Nick Boles, his ministerial friend pointed out yesterday (odd that Miliband didn’t quote him). But Miliband cannot control it either, so presumably thinks immigration from the rest of the EU is a good thing – or at the very least a price worth paying for the other benefits of EU membership. So Miliband’s criticism is that Cameron shouldn’t have promised what he couldn’t deliver, whereas what he said, “He has failed,” implies that he should have succeeded.

And through it all, the Prime Minister spoilt his case, which is to try to defend his reasonable and pragmatic pro-EU position, by exaggeration. The decision to allow free movement from new EU countries in 2004, he said, was a “catastrophically bad decision”. No, it wasn’t. It allowed a lot of people to come here legally, many of whom might have come anyway; it helped boost the economy; on balance some of the problems were greater than expected; and anyway Miliband has already said it was a mistake.

Cameron did it again, when Dan Jarvis, who some people think is the next Labour prime minister, asked a question about making work pay. The Prime Minister’s answer glinted like a dagger through the smoke as he explained that Miliband’s plan to raise the minimum wage to £8 an hour was lower than where the rate would end up, if left to the independent Low Pay Commission, “on reasonable expectations” by 2020. “Those geniuses,” he said, pointing at Miliband and Ed Balls, had spent all summer coming up with a plan to “cut the minimum wage”. Again, Cameron won the point. Again, he spoiled it. “What a complete and utter shower.”

What did those words add, except to reflect badly on the person saying them?

It was a relief, therefore, to have a question from someone who knew how it is done. Margaret Beckett, Labour, Lincoln once upon a time, Leader pro tem, Foreign Secretary, serious person, asked the Prime Minister about warnings of a crisis in the NHS in England – “that’s the bit he’s responsible for” – chastised him gently for deflecting questions last week with answers about the NHS in Wales, and said: “Can we have an English answer to an English question?”

More dagger than smoke, that one.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in