Plebgate Part 2: When institutions fail us, who can the public trust?

The institutions the public can rely on are rapidly dwindling, but still, this scandal in the police force is on a different scale

Simon Kelner
Thursday 20 December 2012 06:00 EST
Comments
Left: Andrew Mitchell. Right: Nobody matching the description of the off-duty police officer, who claimed to have witnessed the outburst, appears to be present in this CCTV still
Left: Andrew Mitchell. Right: Nobody matching the description of the off-duty police officer, who claimed to have witnessed the outburst, appears to be present in this CCTV still (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When a relationship turns sour, there's a familiar phrase employed in the aftermath: once the trust had gone, there was nothing left. So what are we supposed to do when the bond of trust between we the citizens and the instruments of state is broken? Go for some counselling?

The incident – if indeed that's what it was – which took place last September involving the then Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell and the policemen on duty in Downing Street was, on the face of it, pretty small beer. A politician with a notoriously superior bearing was asked to get off his bike by a policeman who was being fastidious (perhaps to a fault) in applying the rules.

In his irritability, Mr Mitchell swore at said copper. This much, as far as I can tell, is not disputed, and in a different, less highly-charged, time, that might have been the end of it.

However, oaths are one thing, classist insults are another. He called me a pleb, said the policeman. I most certainly didn't, countered Mr Mitchell. And because we don't trust the political classes any more, because we think they've all got their noses in the trough, or even the duck house, we were all too willing to accept the word of the bobbies on that particular beat. The newspapers were, the public were, and David Cameron was. So Mr Mitchell was booted out of office on the back of what now looks like a confected charge.

So where does that leave us now? We lost faith in those who run our banks some time ago, the expenses scandal did for politicians, and we have just spent more than a year inspecting every piece of our national newspapers' dirty linen. Are there no institutions we can rely on any more? Well, only the good old BBC... oh, hold on a minute.

But this is on a different scale: if you can no longer trust the police, where does that leave us as a society? Which is the question I'd like to pose today. I said at the time that this whole affair had a fishy smell about it, and it does now appear that Mr Mitchell was tucked up like a kipper.

So, on the same day that the Home Secretary announced that there is to be a major investigation into police actions during and after the Hillsborough disaster, we are told that there is to be an inquiry into what happened the evening Andrew Mitchell allegedly went tonto in Whitehall. And who's going to be investigating the actions of members of the Metropolitan Police? Why, the Metropolitan Police of course.

I heard the MP Keith Vaz on the radio yesterday morning demanding a more independent inquiry. But as I listened to Mr Vaz's perfectly reasonable argument, all I could think was: weren't you involved in the Hinduja affair, and didn't you once claim £173,000 in expenses in a year?

Everywhere we look, we are finding it harder and harder to trust those who are meant to govern us, protect us, and look after our interests. We need help, because without trust, all we have is suspicion.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in