Mohammed Asghar blasphemy case: This flagrant breach of rights must be undone
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Last Thursday, Mohammed Asghar, a 69-year-old shopkeeper from Edinburgh who has been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic, was sentenced to death. The sentence came after two marathon hearings and a three-year trial process.
It started when a disgruntled tenant in Islamabad took letters containing allegedly blasphemous statements to the local police. Although he had taken the letters from Mr Asghar a month before, he felt no need to report them until just days after Mr Asghar served him with an eviction notice.
Section 295-C of Pakistan's penal code permits the imposition of the death penalty for blasphemy. Both the principles of Sharia and Pakistan’s criminal law, however, make it clear that a mentally ill person cannot be given a death sentence.
After suffering a stroke in 2000 that affected both his mental and physical health, Mr Asghar was admitted to a psychiatric facility in Edinburgh in 2010.
While evidence proving he was incompetent to stand trial was presented to the court, judges refused to acknowledge it.
Mr Asghar will have to wait years for any appeal against his patently unsafe conviction. The Pakistani and British authorities must work together to ensure that this flagrant miscarriage of justice is undone, and Mr Asghar’s human rights are respected.
Catherine Higham is a case worker on Reprieve’s death penalty team.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments