Letter from the Personal Finance Editor: Cutting out the middle man could spell disaster for employees and consumers alike
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The collapse of Phones 4u into administration yesterday left 5,596 workers facing unemployment. That’s a tragedy, but is the inevitable result when suppliers decide to – as it is known in business jargon – disintermediarise.
In plain English that means cutting out the middle man. That’s the fate of the 25-year-old mobile phone retailer whose supply was cut, first by Three, 02 and Vodafone, and then on Friday by EE.
In a statement, EE talked about a “strategy to focus on growth in our direct channels”. In other words it wants to sell more phones and contracts direct to consumers.
It’s a strategy that many suppliers crave. To bandy around some more business jargon, it’s the business dream of vertical integration, where everything in the supply chain is owned by one business, from production, to marketing, to distribution and delivery. When a business owns all those elements, it can pocket all the profits.
So while yesterday’s announcement is a tragedy for staff, it could also prove to be a tragedy for consumers. Why? Because squeezing intermediaries out of the market is likely to end up reducing price competition.
Intermediaries are not always simply an extra layer of people to be paid. They can also act as a check on an industry and negotiate keener prices. Without that layer there’s little to stop firms acting in unison and raising prices.
It’s a criticism that’s often been levelled at the energy industry, for instance. When one supplier raises prices they all do. The mobile phone industry is in danger of heading down the same anti-competitive path.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments