In the old days we had tupperware parties, now we have botox parties

Maybe we should leave it to the qualified professionals?

Victoria Wright
Wednesday 30 January 2013 09:32 EST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) has produced a new code of practice aimed at doctors, nurses and dentists involved in cosmetic practices such as botox, breast surgery and liposuction.

Professional Standards for Cosmetic Practice focuses on the behaviour and competencies these professionals should be expected to demonstrate when providing cosmetic procedures.

This is good news, particularly for women who have gazed too long into the abyss (the Daily Mail’s sidebar of shame) and been hoodwinked by surgeons into thinking that all it takes is a highlighter pen, a scalpel and a Henry Hoover to cut out, suck up and readjust their flesh and – voila! – you look exactly like Cheryl Cole (kind of).

The guidance also tells surgeons they should not imply that treatment will improve a patient’s psychological wellbeing and to avoid words such as 'nicer' and 'better', instead using words such as 'smaller' and ‘bigger’ when talking about procedures. Hopefully this also includes not saying “I can absolutely make your nose more beautiful, less Jewish and unattractive” as experienced by Katie Green who wrote so eloquently about it for this paper last year.

As for those at-home cosmetic procedure parties, nicknamed ‘Botox parties’, the RCS has also advised they should be banned. The RCS recommends that only doctors, dentists or nurses who have undergone the appropriate training should be allowed to perform these treatments as currently they can be delivered by people with no medical qualifications or healthcare training.

In the old days women would hold ‘tupperware parties’ and eat cheese and pineapple on sticks whilst cooing at plastic boxes you could bung a quiche in and keep airtight for 15 years. Now we have ‘Botox parties’, where a person, who may have no medical qualifications whatsoever, comes over to your home to inject toxins into your face, while your friends gather round cooing at how tight your forehead is.

When it comes to cosmetic treatments, I’m in the ‘women can do what they want to their faces if it’s their choice’ camp. But it unnerves me that women are willing to take such risks for a smoother forehead. After all you wouldn’t let Sandra from the local beauty salon give you a manicure followed by a smear test would you?

Ladies, if you must nip and tuck, take note of what the RCS is saying and find a qualified medical practitioner who can give you professional expertise instead of crossed fingers, honesty instead of false expectations. Because your health and wellbeing is worth it, as Cheryl would say (kind of).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in