If I were Prime Minister: Corporations would no longer be able to conspire against the public and get away with it

Our series in the run-up to the General Election – 100 days, 100 contributors, but no politicians – continues with the professor of intellectual history

Stefan Collini
Thursday 02 April 2015 13:56 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I would have the courage to say that I am very strongly ‘anti-business’, at least where ‘business’ means multinational corporations and financial organisations.

The vast concentration of wealth controlled by commercial and financial interests currently operates as a conspiracy against the public. I would, therefore: make effective representation of both the workforce and the public interest compulsory on all company’s boards; impose a maximum ratio on the difference between the highest- and lowest-paid in any organisation; make the long-term benefits to all stakeholders the only allowable measure of corporate ‘success’; impose a transaction tax on all stock markets and currency trading; make it illegal for companies to operate from a tax-haven or outside agreed international fiscal jurisdictions; increase corporation tax.

Extremes of inequality are making our society dysfunctional as well as unjust. Therefore, I would: impose increasingly progressive rates of taxation on all incomes that exceed five times the living wage; devise a tax that recoups for society a large proportion of the increase in value consequent upon rising property prices; tax capital gains and other income from investments at the highest marginal rate; remove tax-free status from higher earners’ savings and pensions contributions.

Privatisation places profit above service and pretends pseudo-competition is efficient. I would therefore: re-nationalise the rail and bus services and Royal Mail; ban Private Finance Initiative deals which funnel public funds to private pockets; give the NHS the power to impose public interest contracts on all private providers; only allow ‘outsourcing’ where the interests of all stakeholders, including future employees, are protected.

A ‘flexible labour market’ is a euphemism for exploitation. I would, therefore: make payment of an adequate minimum ‘living wage’ compulsory; ensure all employees are provided with the full range of benefits, including sickness pay, maternity leave, and pensions; give employment tribunals powers to prevent dismissals without external assessment of alternatives; ban ‘performance-related pay’ and zero-hours contracts.

A civilized society provides public support for educational and cultural goods. I would therefore: establish a new Ministry of Culture, Science, and Higher Education with a ring-fenced budget to provide long-term support for these public goods; abolish tuition fees and return to direct public funding of universities; return so-called ‘faith schools’, ‘free schools’, and ‘academies’ to local authority control, allocating places by lottery and banning selection; abolish charitable status for private schools.

Clearly, we cannot go on destroying our natural environment at the present rate. I would therefore: make sustainable energy targets legally enforceable; suspend trade with, and deny legal protection to, international polluters; strengthen restrictions on building on green-field sites; restrict de-forestation.

Finally, I would personally supervise the enforcement of a law compelling anyone caught describing the rich as ‘wealth producers’ or referring to citizens as ‘customers’ to be put in the stocks and pelted with re-cycled copies of the abuse the Right-wing press would undoubtedly heap on this modest and sensible programme.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in