i Editor's Letter: The spying game

 

Alistair Dawber
Wednesday 30 October 2013 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If there’s one golden rule of spycraft, it must surely be – don’t get caught.

From Berlin, to Paris and Madrid, lots of European governments are in a flap about leaders’ phones being hacked into and citizens’ email being monitored, but Ms Merkel, and Messrs Hollande and Rajoy are largely playing to their domestic audiences now that the story is in the public domain – the outrage is faux and designed to temper the damage domestically, rather than to express any genuine anger with the Americans. Frankly, these countries would have been surprised if these things weren’t happening.

Stories like this are reported from time. Only yesterday, it emerged that USB sticks and phone chargers handed out to leaders at last month’s G20 meeting at St Petersburg may in fact have been bugging devices – all very Q’s laboratory – but what wasn’t reported was whether any leaders had actually used these things. Of course they hadn’t.

And who can forget our spooks’ ham-fisted attempts to listen in on our Russian cousins using a listening device that resembled – although not clearly enough – a rock, which was placed in the garden of some official building or another in Moscow. We got caught. It was embarrassing. The game goes on.

What may be a slightly different question is whether newspapers, including this one, should publish this sort of information when it materialises, or as David Cameron might prefer, we keep schtum in the interests of national security. When governments get caught, of course it’s embarrassing, but that’s not a good enough reason to withhold a story. Newspapers, are, generally speaking, pretty responsible species and have no interest in inviting Armageddon any more than the government of the day.

i@independent.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in