i Editor's Letter: Shining the spotlight on charities
All non-profits should treat such investigations as a wake-up call
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
I cancelled the direct debit to Oxfam – won by a chugger when I was a teenager – after the charity refused to stop posting me copious junk mail. I’ll never give to them again. Charities can so easily squander trust and undermine their good work.
Britain is the most generous nation in the developed world, with three-quarters of us giving to good causes in a typical month. But a Panorama investigation broadcast tonight will air worrying claims about three major UK charities.
A whistleblower from Save the Children claims that a public condemnation of gas price rises was spiked “because, I was told, it would upset British Gas who were Save the Children donors.” In a leaked email obtained by i, a manager wrote: “We should not risk the EDF partnership.” The charity strongly denies that its silence can be bought, I should add.
Comic Relief, we learn, has invested in funds that bought shares in the alcohol, arms and tobacco industries. Amnesty UK also takes flak.
These are organisations that do great good. But all charities should treat such investigations as a wake-up call: do they need to pay big salaries? Do they have a self-perpetuating bureaucracy? What proportion of donations do they hand straight back to public relations? One reason we chose our Christmas charity, Space for Giants, was because it is so small: your help will go a long way. And it has tiny overheads – all in Kenya, there is no UK office.
Panorama should be applauded. Just as the media must challenge governments, so too must it shine a spotlight on the work of charities – none of which should consider themselves beyond scrutiny.
***
The MPs’ pay rise is not about whether they should be paid more. This decision cannot be taken in a vacuum. So while public sector workers get 1 per cent pay “rises”, MPs can whistle for their 11 per cent. Reject it, now, loudly, and all together – and forget about it until more prosperous times. You may just win back some respect.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments