i Editor's Letter: Because the NHS matters to us

 

Oliver Duff
Friday 30 May 2014 18:52 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Later this year I’m booked to give a talk at medical school about media ethics and health. What, I asked a few of the doctors, did they want to know? Several spoke of the damage to morale in the NHS that they felt was caused by frequent negative headlines. How did we, as editors, weigh this against the obvious benefits in exposing malpractice or a decline in care?

I received a recent letter along similar lines from Peter Wilshaw in Eccleshall, Stafford. “An hour ago I was discharged from Stafford Hospital following surgery,” Peter wrote. “Everything was superb, flaw- less: head and shoulders above the care I received at two private hospitals. Stafford was appalling and many in this area were affected to some degree. My 93-year-old mother counts herself lucky to have survived. But I implore the media and politicians to now leave our hospital alone, drop the words scandal-hit.”

Today’s cover story is a concerning report about the NHS in England: cancer treatment targets have been missed for the first time since their introduction five years ago. (Wales and Scotland outperform English trusts.)

Cancer treatment waiting times determine living or dying. They are not a matter of convenience. Doctors say off the record that the missed targets show how much strain the NHS is under – and highlight the cash crisis looming after next year’s general election. Cancer services are also in greater demand because of growing public awareness and more diagnoses, which is a great thing.

When we put stories about the NHS on the front page, good or bad – and we do so only after weighing the evidence, and listening to credible third-parties – it is because we care deeply about our health service and know many of you do too.

i@independent.co.uk.

Twitter.com: @olyduff

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in