Errors and Omissions: They do things differently in Headlineland

The Independent's letters editor and chief pedant spots this week's best howlers

Guy Keleny
Friday 04 April 2014 12:53 EDT
Comments
The Mormon Temple, Preston
The Mormon Temple, Preston (Arcaid/UIG via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

“Mentally ill man allowed to donate fortune to Mormons,” yelled a headline on a news page on Thursday, reporting on a case in the Court of Protection. The story soon put things in proportion: “The man wants to donate almost £7,000 of an inheritance to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

This is the 21st century. Inflation has taken a terrible toll. The rich and silly can easily spend £7,000 on a meal with drinks in a restaurant. It must be 500 years since £7,000 amounted to a fortune – that is to say, a lump sum that would produce an income on which one could live, obviating the need to work.

But then again, this is Headlineland. Here, every actor is a “star”, every painting a “masterpiece”, every goose a swan – and every substantial sum of money a “fortune”.

-----------------------

On Thursday, we carried a picture of two young women in a punt in Cambridge. The one poling the punt was wearing a mask against the air pollution. The caption: “A punt operator in Cambridge yesterday. The air quality in East Anglia is forecast to remain ‘very high’ until tomorrow.”

No, it’s the pollution that is forecast to remain very high: the air quality will, presumably, remain very low. And the woman in the mask is not a “punt operator”; she is just a woman poling a punt. The only punt operator I know of in Cambridge is Scudamore’s boatyard, where you go to hire a punt (if you are not a member of a college that operates its own punts).

-----------------------

A perennial caption problem popped up on Wednesday. The caption on a fashion picture said: “A model presents a creation for summer 2015 by Alexandre Herchcovitch at Sao Paulo Fashion Week in Brazil.”

Of course she’s a model; she doesn’t look much like a plumber to me. The point is that this is not a picture of her at all: it is a picture of the clothes she is wearing, and the words “A model presents” are redundant. That will be obvious to followers of fashion.

The rest of us may find it difficult to see this as anything other than a picture of an elegant young woman. People who have to write captions for fashion pictures need to think of the clothes as a car. When you see a publicity shot of a bloke at the wheel of a Lamborghini, you don’t think of it as a picture of the male model; it’s a picture of the car.

-----------------------

A leading article on Tuesday asked: “How can it possibly be fair for those without a university degree to stump up for the income-boosting education of those who do?” This starts as one sentence and ends as another. You need either “… those who do not have a university degree … those who do” or “… those without a university degree … those with one”.

-----------------------

A news story on Monday reported that houses are selling for near the asking price “as buyers chase a scarce supply of property”. No, the properties are scarce: the supply is low, or poor.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in