David Cameron's promise of an in/out referendum was full of contradictions and creates more, not less, uncertainty about Britain's future

A former leader of Belgium lambasts this morning's speech by the Prime Minister

Guy Verhofstadt
Wednesday 23 January 2013 13:32 EST
Comments
David Cameron today promised an in/out referendum on the UK's membership of the European Union by the end of 2017 if the Conservatives win the next general election
David Cameron today promised an in/out referendum on the UK's membership of the European Union by the end of 2017 if the Conservatives win the next general election (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Cameron's promise to hold a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union within the next five years, regardless of the state of negotiations over a revised EU Treaty, is playing with fire. He can control neither the timing nor the outcome of the negotiations, and in so doing is raising false expectations that can never be met and jeopardising both Britain's long-term interests and the unity of the EU.

The speech itself contained something for everyone, as its main purpose was to unite his own party on the issue of Europe. But it was full of inconsistencies.

Strength in numbers

He claims to want a common set of rules for the Single Market at the same time as wanting exceptions for Britain. He wants a Single Market Council to focus on raising competitiveness, but we already have one. He wants a global response to terrorism but aims to withdraw the UK from co-operation on justice and police work. He claims that Europe just offers more of the same and never changes; but the EU is constantly changing and adapting to circumstances.

I expect more integration will be necessary - at least within the Eurozone - in the years ahead as a response to the debt and banking crisis. It is the Conservative Party's 'conservative' attitude to Europe that perhaps needs to change, and instead recognise that in the 21st century Member States wield greater influence by sticking and acting together.

Seeking unilateral renegotiation or repatriation of existing powers would threaten the integrity of the Single Market and risks precipitating a free-for all as other countries seek concessions to suit their own national interests. Cameron will not succeed if he attempts to hold his European partners to ransom.

The real problem for Cameron is the internal rift within his own party and the pressure from Ukip. He seems to be jeopardising the interests of his country for internal party stability. Britain has suffered over the years from the chronic failure of politicians to make a positive case for Europe and counter the untruths in much of the populist press. He did make an attempt at this in sections of the speech, suggesting that it was not his vision to see Britain isolated in the world.

Contradicting himself

But by promising to effectively pull Britain out of the EU unless he can repatriate powers he contradicts his own intentions and creates more, not less, uncertainty about Britain's future.

The one positive effect of the speech is the genuine debate that is finally taking place about the EU and Britain's place in it. Business leaders and US diplomats have lately decided to speak out publicly, so worried are they by the prospects of Britain cutting itself off from the world's largest trading bloc.

I favour a more efficient European Union, with enhanced capability to act on the global stage - including co-ordinating responses to conflict and terror threats in our neighbourhood. Britain has been and surely will continue to be a key part of that - but only if it remains a full member of the club.

Guy Verhofstadt was Prime Minister of Belgium from 1999 to 2008. He is President of the Group of Liberals and Democrats in the European Parliament

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in