Tim Walker: Why is it so easy to laugh at dictators?

We really ought to welcome the demise of the last funny dictator

Tim Walker
Friday 23 December 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kim Jong-Il may have been a murderous despot, but he was pretty funny in Team America. His platform shoes were hilarious, as were North Korean claims that he hit 11 holes-in-one on his first round of golf – not to mention his affection for the films of Elizabeth Taylor.

But with Gaddafi gone in the same year, the world is abruptly bereft of amusing autocrats. Since his death in 2006, even the entertaining dictatorship of Turkmen president Saparmurat Niyazov has been dismantled by his successor, who repealed the law that named months of the year after members of Niyazov family, and removed the rotating gold statue of Niyazov from the centre of Ashgabat.

Which of the world's surviving tyrants will make us chuckle now? Mugabe isn't funny. The Burmese junta? Not exactly a laugh a minute. Even Mahmoud Ahmedinejad isn't funny, though he does wear a funny beige jacket.

The comical dictator is a tradition that goes back at least as far as that angry little chap, Napoleon – but what makes one maniac funny, and another merely a maniac? Simple repression, isolationism and mass murder don't cut it; you need a barmy personality cult, too.

We really ought to welcome the demise of the last funny dictator. Bashar al-Assad's accountant-like banality helps us to see the crimes of his administration clearly, without the distraction of conspicuous craziness. But there was something daft about a tiny fellow in cheap pyjamas which allowed us to think of Kim as a kitsch curiosity.

If we want kitsch curiosities, we have the Eurovision Song Contest. Kim is better remembered as someone who starved and stunted a nation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in